Coding Using NVivo Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Coding Using NVivo - Assignment ExampleIt was a consentaneous new experience switching from the manual use of selective information analysis to digitized data analysis. Indeed for the fact that qualitative explore makes use of non-numerical and unstructured data (Merriam, 2009), it was highly impossible to think of single software that could analyze data from as wide range of topical areas as possible. Using the NVivo was as well another(prenominal) way of developing my personal skills as far as information and communication technology is concerned. Even more, my analytical skills were deepened because the software opens the researcher up to the slender analysis of as many sources of data that relate to the researchers topic as possible (Patton, 2002). Switching from the hand coding technique, which is more of a manual system of data analysis to the use of the more digitized NVivo certainly comes with a number of challenges. In the first place, the processes that the researcher has to go through to get reliable analysis of data is quite cumbersome as compared to the hand coding method, which is more straight forward and up to the point (Maxwell, 2005). For example the researcher is obliged to go through processes such as the application of fine tools, description of detailed analysis before the use of qualitative modeling (School of serviceman & Health Sciences, 2009). What is more, the user ought to have an understanding of the many different features of the software and this was not easy to achieve. Even though the tools help in guaranteeing reliability and validity, it could also serve as means of undermining the same if the researcher is not very familiar with the tools.For most researchers, the reason why they avoid the use of qualitative research method is the difficulty associated with achieving reliability and validity when this method this used (Miles and Huberman, 1994). This is because for most available research designs from which the researc her may select from, the use of randomized sampling of respondents is minimized. Meanwhile, much of the attainment of validity and reliability rests with random sampling. To this end, the introduction of the NVivo to guarantee validity and reliability is a major advantage and brings so much sleep to researchers. Even more, there becomes an empirical status attached to the analysis that is undertaken (Gibson and Brown, 2009). Indeed apart from the use of such digitized software, researchers would have a field day on the use of subjective analysis to undertake data analysis that could hardly be questioned for opinions expressed.